This poem makes me think of coming back late from a party and discovering that the phone has been off the hook for a least half the day. Those of of us with nerves even the sniffling drivel of bad poets at sparsely attended open readings cannot rattle know the anxiety of the phone off the hook, the screaming, whining, whirling sirens of hell filling an empty room from shag carpet to cob webbed ceiling corner, satanic variations within the monochromatic scale, bristling fingers on a blackboard amplified with Glen Branca's Fender Twin Reverb, a sonic variety of nerve gas that is nothing less than the hungry ID demanding more pie, or that you bake one right now if no slices remain.
This is sound intended to kill appetites and interest in community affairs; all one needs are books from which to paraphrase metaphors and contextualize the evidence of one's life until there are only footnotes and marginalia where a pulse used to be. There is the scraping of fingertips across a page of paper irritating to the touch, there is a click, a rattle in one's throat as instinct commands you to say something to void the emptiness, but there is only phlegm, a congealed incoherence suitable for a celebrity wedding.
This poem is a compost heap of vowels and their modifiers that was left in back of the garage in the wan hope that they'd be rich with meaning by the time spring air altered the way clouds form on the morning and evening horizons. Often enough we write things down so we would have ad libs and occasional poems to utter when the plumbing groans and the siren rhyme of the cold water streaming to tub and basin obscures the pleasant voice of a lover you remember through the concrete of missing minutes in the day.It is a series of disjointed gestures only a keyboard and monitor could create ; the screen fills up with words quickly as would a glass held under a drooling spigot. There is little to savor in the nonsequitors that abound, as each sentence doesn't end but rather just changes its mind; these stanzas have short attention spans, the music is the grinding of a mind taxing itself until each Hollywood Ending that didn't come your way regardless of prayers and demands to powerful resources becomes blurs and then dissolve, like frames of cheap film stock on an over heated camera.
This poem fails in ways far too ugly to bring into mixed company. This poem is like that noise, a constant string of phrases that are a constant noise textured with static and prickly heat. I would prefer to listen to someone continually busting open the Velcro fly on their old Members Only jacket. I imagine the being someone who would find placing his thumb on an old record turntable to be great fun, a reminder to himself and a warning to the world that entropy trumps ambition, needless ejaculations of fear and panic beat a massage and after dinner sex. The poem is finally about itself, not who ever he might have been addressing in whatever simulation of a life there is on the other side of his apartment door; we cannot, of course, escape the prison house of language, but there is a point where self reflexivity is merely a dodge, a distraction that we have yet another poet who is tone deaf to the art of collage, cannot construct an ear worthy pastiche, is unwilling to abandon the disguises and borrowed phonics and consider his future as an author of writing with uneven line breaks.
This poem is the test pattern staring at you after you come out of a black out. The national anthem has been played and the stadium is empty, like this poem.
Friday, March 2, 2012
A pointless encounter with Davy Jones
I met Davy Jones and Micky Dolnez during the 70s in the men's room of the main stage area of the Sacramento State Fair, where they were performing as the Monkees with their songwriters Boyce and Hart. I noticed Dolnez teasing his Fro in the mirror while Davy Jones washed his hands. I went up to Jones and grabbed his damp hand and shook , telling him it was great to see them together again. I was schmoozing of course, thinking it more appropriate to lie to a minor celebrity rather than remind him that he was years beyond his prime.
"Yeah," said Jones in a dazed monotone, "it's really great to be back together".
He looked like he was waiting for a firing squad to arrive. Dolnez finished fluffing his frantic billowing bouffant and walked up to Jones. He looked like someone who'd been handed a note written in a language he couldn't read. He was in a hurry. He and Jones had to get out of there.
Thursday, March 1, 2012
ANDREW BREITBART
My condolences go out to late conservative agitator Andrew
Breitbart’s family and friends for their
loss, but he was, in truth, a hyped up and generally unlikeable sociopath who
had enough media savvy to know how to make a living and keep his name in the papers
by being a vindictive and ugly little troll. It was show biz with him, not
politics, and what he did was a shtick that was no more elevated than what
we've seen for decades in professional wrestling: he was willingly,
purposefully being the Villain, the Man You Love to Hate. He was ruthless in
making already repulsive Conservative talking points even uglier, and no amount
of righteous indignation coming his way could slow him down. I go with what Lawrence O'Donnell said last
night in that the private Breitbart and the public Breitbart were two different
things. According to him , and others who recalled their friendships with the
deceased, AB was someone who got "into character" when the cameras
were on him.There is , however, evil in the world; doing what he did in the
media regarding public policy , turning it into a carnival, was an evil thing
to do.His biggest asset was his lack of the capacity to be embarrassed or feel
shame. Him dying so young is, in itself, a tragic event, but the loss of him
his presence robs us of nothing . His death only reminds the rest of us that
we've allowed our political discussion to be reduced to a geek show.
Sunday, February 26, 2012
Essays I Haven't Written
Poetry is about saying it as it seems. Saying it "like
it is" assumes the Romantic trap of thinking that the final state of
things can be deigned by the poet’s sense of what cannot be accurately or
concisely phrased. The permanent significance some poets attempt to capture is
an illusion: word meanings change, cultural habits change, reading habits
change, world views change, the meanings of what was formally thought to be a
settled affair changes as well. Or rather our attitudes change to the subject
changes. The object is inert, bereft of meaning. The poet, attempting a verse
that reaches years , decades beyond it's time, is better served getting his her
own properly and artfully qualified perception of events and ideas right. One
might not trust met narratives anymore, but brilliant individual responses are
always illuminating.
__________________
__________________
Barry Alfonso, noted essayist and Traveling Man, had this to say in a note regarding the manufacturing of Hip Consensus:
It seems to me that the heyday of rock criticism almost
precisely followed the arc of the counter culture of the late ‘60s/early ‘70s,
when the exalted arrogance of The Young (or at least the “hip” segment of it)
believed in a unified code of ideals and ethics, built around misty notions of
revolution, self-liberation and hirsute hedonism. There was a cleanly-drawn
line between Cool and Uncool in those days and the leading rock critics of the
time fell in line with the prevailing ethos. The rise of the underground press
rewarded the music scribes with small change, psychic cachet and innumerable
promo albums, creating an ambiguous symbiotic relationship with a music
business that didn’t want to change the world so much as make lots and lots of
$$$. It became something of a Ponzi scheme of the collective mind, crashing
somewhere between the rise of Jimmy Carter and the fall of disco. The rhetoric of
Marsh, Nelson, etc. did get seriously inflated and hyperbolic, straining to
pump up a few hirsute entertainers into the reincarnations of Byron and Keats.
The work of too many of these critics seems myopic, jejune and often
pretentious by current standards, the detritus of a time when the economy was
booming and youngsters could afford to imagine something as unsustainable as a
Woodstock Nation. Still, there are moments of colorful, cogent writing to be
found as well. The golden era of rock criticism was more than a make-work
project or a sustained act of wankery – in fact, I think the first Rolling
Stone Record Review anthology is just as good a read as your typical WPA Guide.
________________________
I’d agree that Costello has
spread himself too thin in his efforts to become the most versatile rock
songwriter of his generation, but what has diluted his later work isn’t variety
so much as ambition. His work was already diverse in the styles it
employed—Motown, gospel, Brill building power-sob-ballading, folk traditions,
guitar-centered rock power chording, effortlessly melodic and melancholy
ballads—a habit gained from his other principle influence, the Beatles, and as
the wide swath of approaches has given him to write an amazingly solid set of
poetic/obscure/ brilliantly hard nosed lyrics that could accommodate several
themes and subterranean intellection in
the space of a compelling song. Doubtless the dips, curves and marvelously
detailed turns of the songs forced him to work a mite harder with a lyric. Some
of it was, of course, a grueling strangeness that was more alienating than
alienated, but the records he produced from My
Aim is True through Imperial Bedroom
were overall a dazzling array of stanzas and catchy choruses that would seduce
the sensibility in a masterful variety of styles. Costello, though, is a pop
songwriter for all the subtlety his music contains, and he been seduced by the
notion that he should be an artiste— as the pieces got longer, the styles taken
from a broader sample, the variety more dress-up make believe than convinced of
its own primacy, the good man reveals himself a talented musician in a hurry
for a more impressive reputation. What I think Dylan would have benefited from
is the sort of range the earlier work of Costello shared; his lyrics would have
been sharper more often.
_______________________________
_______________________________
Most popular music is theme
songs for losers and their moron cousins, dreamers. Dreamers just haven't yet
received the memo. Who would listen to it if it were a winner's game. A room
full of Bud Collier clones in Groucho glasses.
___________________________
___________________________
The basic flaw in the auteur theory is that it preferred
hero worship over art, which was a convenient way to overlook the wooden set
ups otherwise hack directors presented audiences. There was the misconception
that just because someone would film situations similar from film to film , it
constituted an aesthetic and constituted a style; some were artful in their
familiar scenes and scenarios, but far more were merely fashioning a way to
work quick and under budget.
Friday, February 24, 2012
Vowel Movement
“Movement”, a poem by Wyn Cooper, is that frustrating species of a poem that starts off well enough, full of promise and intrigue, that chokes to a close. It begins as a smooth ride with effortless transitions between speeds suddenly becomes a lurching, jerking collapse. We are to make note of all the movement that occurs in this narrative, the countryside the narrator speaks of to his unknown companion. The tone is nostalgic, the recounting of annoyances fondly recalled. But time goes on, life advances from one neighborhood to another, one terrain for another completely unlike it. One moves and attempts to be quickly assimilated by something more urban, bustling, impatient, impolite, a city that the narrator doesn't want to discuss, not for long.
This is the pun contained in the title, an obvious ploy from the get-go; the irony, I suppose, would be that the weather, the relative stillness, the lack urgency in the bucolic ruins of fading America are not, in fact, cursed with inertia, as the speaker addresses the particulars with telling, nearly idealized detail. An implied sigh accompanies the pause between first and second stanza; this is the part of the conversation where the speaker is lost in thought and averts his eyes, falls into a melancholy that dares him to speak what he is not able to find words for. The poem goes from being fairly specific to vague and euphemistic. The effect is spoiled by Wyn Cooper's need, to sum up, the inchoate morass seething under the surface of these well-mannered images;
"...before wesettled in a city of other movements,found new rhythms that suit us better,we tell ourselves over and over. "
The poem is a nice if other unremarkable presentation of the low-level anxiety that haunts the suburbia of John Cheever, who was a master short story writer and novelist who explored a generation of the white middle class that had to distract themselves with drugs, adultery, and workaholism. The aim of those who lived in Cheever's New York's outer communities was a continual effort to dull a collective suspicion that the lifestyle and manicured neighborhoods they chose for themselves are lifeless results of preferring Bad Faith over singular authenticity. Cheever, though, was much subtler and more lyrical as he wrote of his characters attempts to fill an emptiness that will not be healed. Cooper had some more writing to do to make this idea work; the poem just quits suddenly and the screen one imagines this monologue being played against goes blank. The last sentence reveals an unwillingness to see this thing through. The poet is unsure how he wants to talk about this string of related icons.
Sunday, February 19, 2012
Nolan Finley is a big fat meanie
Nolan Finley is editorial page editor for my home town newspaper, The Detroit News, and he writes an opinion column that reflects the terse bluntness of someone who does not give a righteous rat's ass about the welfare of others. He is a seriously constipated White Guy who prefers his anger to facts, compassion. His Bible, it seems, are the numbers appearing the Bottom Line. Today he equates "Obamacare" with an historically unprecedented attack on the rights and liberties of American citizens. He only seems content when is in a foaming lather.
Finley seems to think that the capacity of the American people to contract catastrophic diseases with no medical resources is a Constitutional right and that Obama is being a bully in seeking to make sure that the great number of the uninsured have coverage they can afford. This upsets Finley no end and writes himself into a perfectly illogical snit: what's really being argued for here isn't anything like Liberty, Freedom or Individual Rights, but rather a thinly disguised rant for the sick, the injured, the poor and the homeless to die off faster than they already are. This is just mean, in plain fact, the reactionary , paranoid ravings of someone who is afraid that he is going to have his toys taken away. Rather than discuss what needs to be done about health care, Finley drapes himself in the flag and red-baits the issue. That is cowardly, it is cheap, it is disgusting and self centered.
Thursday, February 16, 2012
Pound Cake
While discussing the aching , seemingly inexpressible pain and confusion that profound states of love and infatuation can create within a soul, poet Robert Pinsky brings up the touchy subject of Ezra Pound. Pinsky, to be sure, qualifies his praise for the late bard appropriately, stating emphatically that his treasonous broadcasts against the American war effort in WW2 and his racial theories are gross perversions. One had to concede his gift, though, the ear he had, his seemingly flawless ability to join t high falutin' , archaic and colloquial language into a new poetry that could touch the deepest , most inaccessible cords within the human soul.
This is Pinsky's belief, and he makes a good argument, but I don't hear the same music he does. I willI concede , though, that Pound was Modernism's premiere talent scout;
problematic as T.S.Eliot's own anti-scepticism and conservatism are, his genius
as a poet and critic make him Pound's principle gift to 20th century culture.
Otherwise, I find Pound's own work, in large parts, to be an unsatisfying ,
lumpy mash up of styles, ideas and techniques that are finally doomed, despite
bits of real brilliance, to a nostalgic ambivalence preventing his work from
truly catching fire, as the work of Eliot, Blake and Yeats had done.
There is,
too often, a sage tone that is emulation, constructed, not actually inspired,
created perhaps in ironic parody of the older forms Pound sought to separate
modern poetry from. The effect, though, is that he seems tethered to the past,
as he spent a lifetime trying to create something of equal genius on the terms
of past masters. This , I think, contributes to the blow hard I hear in is
writing, a smart man , not a brilliant one, who cannot distinguish between his
good ideas and his bad ones.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
The firing of pop music Robert Christgau from the Village Voice by their new owners gives me yet another reason to pass up the weekly on the...
-
Why Bob Seger isn't as highly praised as Springsteen is worth asking, and it comes down to something as shallow as Springsteen being t...
