![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhd-XY4I8O5dFeCxa3MD6YznIP0nCEOdYFFXQMa7Hre0s2XIGEGW_hi-PU-LWFsKU8FSA2ZvliBtZFmVIor1OU90ZukOgUU-thdSH0depuubBZhO0RY1xqZW3pgc2KBZ9G_X4eG/s320-rw/genter+and+draper%252C+la+jolla+california+2011.jpg)
This is Pinsky's belief, and he makes a good argument, but I don't hear the same music he does. I willI concede , though, that Pound was Modernism's premiere talent scout;
problematic as T.S.Eliot's own anti-scepticism and conservatism are, his genius
as a poet and critic make him Pound's principle gift to 20th century culture.
Otherwise, I find Pound's own work, in large parts, to be an unsatisfying ,
lumpy mash up of styles, ideas and techniques that are finally doomed, despite
bits of real brilliance, to a nostalgic ambivalence preventing his work from
truly catching fire, as the work of Eliot, Blake and Yeats had done.
There is,
too often, a sage tone that is emulation, constructed, not actually inspired,
created perhaps in ironic parody of the older forms Pound sought to separate
modern poetry from. The effect, though, is that he seems tethered to the past,
as he spent a lifetime trying to create something of equal genius on the terms
of past masters. This , I think, contributes to the blow hard I hear in is
writing, a smart man , not a brilliant one, who cannot distinguish between his
good ideas and his bad ones.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are moderated due to spam. But commentaries, opinions and other remarks about the posts are always welcome! I apologize for the inconvenience.