Change is the only possible constant in this universe, and
those things that humans create that have the capacity to change have the
capacity to survive, flourish to some extent, and remain expressively relevant
to modern experience. Blues, like any other art, cannot remain fixed, in
stasis.Those "traditional" forms of blues that well
meaning players attempt to preserve and often preach the absolute virtues of,
were themselves inventions who took their inspiration and building blocks from
older forms that preceded them. It's desirable to listen to, appreciate and
perform older blues styles as a means of staying clued to what an older
generation of musicians can tell us, but it's folly, I believe, for anyone to
insist that the best music peaked there and , in fact, stopped developing.There are only so many kinds of narratives we have in this
current life, not so different from the experience of generations before us
and, I suspect, hardly so alien to what a younger generation will come to live
through. Conditions change, though, economics, the influx of new cultures and
ideas, politics, technology, all these change and inform and influence the
blues players who are learning now, or who will learn. Change is the only
constant, change is inevitable, and those institutions that don't have the
capacity to absorb change and grow as a result will turn into a creaky,
crumbling artifact. The blues is about life as it is lived and felt, present
tense. As long as there are players who feel, cry, laugh hard and feel deeply,
I am fairly sure the tradition of the blues will continue to thrive. It won't
be the same, of course, but the point is that the history of the blues will ask
you this: when was it ever the same?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are moderated due to spam. But commentaries, opinions and other remarks about the posts are always welcome! I apologize for the inconvenience.